wireless: не може да не се похваля
Ей на това му се вика WIRELESS (за 150 лв с ДДС):
root@ftp:~# ping -c5 192.168.100.29
PING 192.168.100.29 (192.168.100.29) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.100.29: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.364 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.100.29: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.286 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.100.29: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.279 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.100.29: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.281 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.100.29: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.281 ms
--- 192.168.100.29 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4009ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.279/0.298/0.364/0.034 ms
root@ftp:~# ping -c5 -s65000 192.168.100.29
PING 192.168.100.29 (192.168.100.29) 65000(65028) bytes of data.
65008 bytes from 192.168.100.29: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=47.4 ms
65008 bytes from 192.168.100.29: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=48.2 ms
65008 bytes from 192.168.100.29: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=45.5 ms
65008 bytes from 192.168.100.29: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=46.2 ms
65008 bytes from 192.168.100.29: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=46.3 ms
--- 192.168.100.29 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4044ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 45.579/46.768/48.220/0.965 ms
И още - при натоварване 20Мбит/с:
root@ftp:~# ping -c5 -s65000 192.168.100.29
PING 192.168.100.29 (192.168.100.29) 65000(65028) bytes of data.
65008 bytes from 192.168.100.29: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=103 ms
65008 bytes from 192.168.100.29: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=110 ms
65008 bytes from 192.168.100.29: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=113 ms
65008 bytes from 192.168.100.29: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=124 ms
65008 bytes from 192.168.100.29: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=121 ms
--- 192.168.100.29 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4043ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 103.344/114.801/124.993/7.652 ms
root@ftp:~# ping -c5 192.168.100.29
PING 192.168.100.29 (192.168.100.29) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.100.29: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=52.2 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.100.29: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=45.2 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.100.29: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=46.6 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.100.29: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=50.5 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.100.29: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=48.8 ms
--- 192.168.100.29 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4047ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 45.270/48.715/52.250/2.545 ms
wireless: не може да не се похваля
Хубаво де, ама похвали се както трябва - дай инфо за устройството и конфигурацията.
wireless: не може да не се похваля
3com pci a/b/g, linux
Засега не бачка на големи разстояния, но сегашното ми трасе е под километър, така че няма проблем:)
wireless: не може да не се похваля
Ми че то 1km си е огромно разстояние бе.
Кажи какви скорости развиваш ?
wireless: не може да не се похваля
Е огромно 1 Км.... айде сега .... Абе каквото и да си говорим 3 com e 3 com.Ако кажеш сега и какви пари е :)) и с какви антени си го пуснал :) иначе от това което си постнал си е направо като ЛАН :) аз мойте ги докарвам почти винаги под 10 мс :) ама не и с такива огормни пакети да са меткат :).Искам и аз такова :))
wireless: не може да не се похваля
3com винаги е №1!!! Тва е положението.
wireless: не може да не се похваля
Не мисля, че заслугата е на 3com, по скоро на Atheros.
Единственото, което 3com са направили, е че ме накараха да ровя по сорса на драйвера, за да им подкарам платката, щото си имат собствено виждане по въпроса за PCI ID-тата. А като цяло поне досега по отношение на wireless продуктите 3com са си направо зле, но забелязвам, че се раздвижват.
Цената и скоростта съм ги посочил още в първия си постинг. Антените не знам как да ги опиша, идват комплект с Proxim MP11, но в Елкостар правят.
wireless: не може да не се похваля
[root@gw root]# ping -c10 -s30000 213.145.124.253
PING 213.145.124.253 (213.145.124.253) from 213.145.124.251 : 30000(30028) bytes of data.
30008 bytes from 213.145.124.253: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=85.4 ms
30008 bytes from 213.145.124.253: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=86.8 ms
30008 bytes from 213.145.124.253: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=84.7 ms
30008 bytes from 213.145.124.253: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=90.0 ms
30008 bytes from 213.145.124.253: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=86.1 ms
30008 bytes from 213.145.124.253: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=86.0 ms
30008 bytes from 213.145.124.253: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=89.3 ms
30008 bytes from 213.145.124.253: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=85.0 ms
30008 bytes from 213.145.124.253: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=86.2 ms
30008 bytes from 213.145.124.253: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=85.3 ms
--- 213.145.124.253 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% loss, time 9089ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 84.742/86.524/90.007/1.736 ms
:)))))
на около 27 км при натоварване около 1мб
п.с. 5.8 гх е радиото
wireless: не може да не се похваля
на 2.4гх на около 8 км. SMC 2655W с антени калифорния
[root@gw root]# ping -c10 -s1000 213.145.122.10
PING 213.145.122.10 (213.145.122.10) from 213.145.122.1 : 1000(1028) bytes of data.
1008 bytes from 213.145.122.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=10.9 ms
1008 bytes from 213.145.122.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=10.5 ms
1008 bytes from 213.145.122.10: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=33.8 ms
1008 bytes from 213.145.122.10: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=7.56 ms
1008 bytes from 213.145.122.10: icmp_seq=5 ttl=255 time=7.11 ms
1008 bytes from 213.145.122.10: icmp_seq=6 ttl=255 time=10.6 ms
1008 bytes from 213.145.122.10: icmp_seq=7 ttl=255 time=9.20 ms
1008 bytes from 213.145.122.10: icmp_seq=8 ttl=255 time=9.17 ms
1008 bytes from 213.145.122.10: icmp_seq=9 ttl=255 time=8.27 ms
1008 bytes from 213.145.122.10: icmp_seq=10 ttl=255 time=7.69 ms
--- 213.145.122.10 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% loss, time 9088ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 7.113/11.497/33.834/7.558 ms
wireless: не може да не се похваля
Ето и от мен малко 5.8Г 15км трафик 5Мбит
SuSE-linux:~ # ping -Avs 1000 -c10 80.72.67.186
PING 80.72.67.186 (80.72.67.186) 1000(1028) bytes of data.
1008 bytes from 80.72.67.186: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=4.59 ms
1008 bytes from 80.72.67.186: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=4.40 ms
1008 bytes from 80.72.67.186: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=4.56 ms
1008 bytes from 80.72.67.186: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=4.30 ms
1008 bytes from 80.72.67.186: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=4.48 ms
1008 bytes from 80.72.67.186: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=4.11 ms
1008 bytes from 80.72.67.186: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=4.62 ms
1008 bytes from 80.72.67.186: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=4.21 ms
1008 bytes from 80.72.67.186: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=4.52 ms
1008 bytes from 80.72.67.186: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=4.17 ms
--- 80.72.67.186 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 42ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.112/4.401/4.628/0.191 ms, ipg/ewma 4.758/4.433 ms